Outside The Box blogs, Autodesk University anecdotes, articles, blog digests, and product news in chronological order. See Writing for the same material by subject.

Design File Locking and Snake Oil Security

· Programming

The increased sharing of electronic CAD data (ala BIM) holds a lot of promise, but it also exposes companies and individuals to additional liability and risk. This additional risk is coming into focus more and more as actual cases of costly legal battles confront engineers and architects. The June 2008 AUGI wishlist results contain “Design File Locking” as the top wish by a substantial margin, and Shaan Hurley lists it as number 3 in the AU 2008 AutoCAD wish list (http://autodesk.blogs.com/between_the_lines/2008/12/au-2008-wednesday-autocad-wish-list.html). Clearly, interest in file and IP security has been growing steadily. As demand for IP security grows, there are sure to be snake oil security vendors trying to cash in on it. I received a spam email a few days ago from SafeNet, Inc. promising “a cost-effective and easy to integrate solution that provides reliable and effective security through the use of digital signatures.” Whenever I see such statements with a long string of buzzwords, my snake oil alarm goes on alert. Digital signatures are for authentication and establishing trust – they cannot and do not provide “reliable and effective security”, although I suppose they could be used by a system that does. In the last year or two, a number of companies have claimed to market software that “secures” AutoCAD DWG files. When I see such a claim, it invariably refers to software that creates an anonymous unequally scaled MINSERT entity. These can be created or “exploded” with a few lines of AutoLISP code. Frequently these companies claim to “encrypt” the drawing, which may sound sexy, but is an outright lie. If this is a level of “security” that meets your needs, at least use one of the many free versions posted throughout the internet (DETER.VLX from DotSoft is one I know of). There are solutions, but they always require changes in the workflow process that involve difficult tradeoffs and careful evaluation of what is technically feasible and practical versus the costs of implementing the changes. There is no such thing as installing a single piece of software to instantly solve the problem. If you are looking for ways to protect intellectual property in your drawing files, don’t be fooled by snake oil security vendors. Disclaimer: One of my hats is the president of CADLock, Inc. (http://www.cadlock.com/), makers of CADVault for AutoCAD.

Read

Propagandapedia

· Industry

Did you ever wonder what press release writers do in their spare time? Given Autodesk's recent trademark litigation with SolidWorks (http://www.cadcourt.com/Docket/308cv04397AutodeskvSolidWorks.aspx) and related efforts (http://www.cadcourt.com/Docket/92047002AutodeskvODA.aspx) by Autodesk to trademark "DWG", and given the fact that US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) trademark examiners are known to use Wikipedia during their research (http://iplitigator.huschblackwell.com/2007/07/articles/trademark/trademark-trial-appeal-board-says-internet-is-here-to-stay/), it doesn't take an evil genius to realize that a little subversive editing here and there might be helpful to the corporate cause. So, I decided to use Wikiscanner (http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/) to go spelunking through the labyrinth of Wikipedia editing history to see if I could unearth any nuggets. …

Read

Update vs. Service Pack

· Personal

Of course I’m talking about Autodesk’s newly reinvented nomenclature for bug fixes (http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/ps/dl/index?siteID=123112&id=2334435&linkID=9240618). Once upon a time they were known as bug fixes, then service packs, and now “updates”. Is the Autodesk marketing department running amok? The subtle spin is certainly a sign of the times, but I wonder if the change in terminology comes about for another reason as well. Autodesk promises “features extensions (http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/index?siteID=123112&id=612485)" to subscription customers. They have had difficulty delivering such extensions on a consistent basis. One of the reasons, I suspect, is that developers of extensions encounter the same brick walls that third party developers battle all the time: AutoCAD bugs, of course; but also incomplete APIs and feature limitations. It’s possible that updates not only fix bugs, but also fill gaps so that extension developers can get their extensions working. Then again, the change in terminology might be part of a new fad. My wife, who is an engineer working in the automotive industry, informs me that they no longer issue drawing revisions in her company. Instead, they now issue “updates”. I wonder how long it will be before auto mechanics stop repairing cars and start updating them instead.

Read